Share this:
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
He’s hilarious… thanks for posting it. I don’t understand it though. do you? What is the formal sense of ‘evil’ by which love evil. Is any commitment to the particular necessarily exclusionary therefore violent therefore evil?
LikeLike
yeah, especially when he seemed to shift his trajectory the from love as general all-embracing love, to love as love for the particular…
LikeLike