Karl Barth on childlessness

‘… there are men who do not become parents. We are thinking of all those who broadly speaking might do so, and perhaps would like to do so, but either as bachelors or in childless marriage do not actually fulfil this possibility. What attitude are they to adopt to this lack? What has the divine command to say to them concerning it? In some degree they will all feel their childlessness to be a lack, a gap in the circle of what nature obviously intends for man, the absence of an important, desirable and hoped for good. And those who have children and know what they owe to them will not try to dissuade them. The more grateful they are for the gift of children, so much the more intimately they will feel this lack with them. Parenthood is one of the most palpable illuminations and joys of life, and those to whom it is denied for different reasons have undoubtedly to bear the pain of loss. But we must not say more. If we can use the rather doubtful expression “happy parents,” we must not infer that childlessness is a misfortune. And we must certainly not speak of an unfruitful marriage, for the fruitfulness of a marriage does not depend on whether it is fruitful in the physical sense. In the sphere of the New Testament message there is no necessity, no general command, to continue the human race as such and therefore to procreate children. That this may happen, that the joy of parenthood should still have a place, that new generations may constantly follow those which precede, is all that can be said in the light of the fact which we must always take into fresh consideration, namely, that the kingdom of God comes and this world is passing away. Post Christum natum there can be no question of a divine law in virtue of which all these things must necessarily take place. On the contrary, it is one of the consolations of the coming kingdom and expiring time that this anxiety about posterity, that the burden of the postulate that we should and must bear children, heirs of our blood and name and honour and wealth, that the pressure and bitterness and tension of this question, if not the question itself, is removed from us all by the fact that the Son on whose birth alone everything seriously and ultimately depended has now been born and has now become our Brother. No one now has to be conceived and born. We need not expect any other than the One of whose coming we are certain because He is already come. Parenthood is now only to be understood as a free and in some sense optional gift of the goodness of God. It certainly cannot be a fault to be without children’. – Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics III/4 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2004), 265.

[Image: Marc Chagall, ‘Abraham and Sarah’, 1956]

3 comments

  1. I think I’m broadly in agreement with Karl on this point, though think that there is much more that needs to be said now, in a world in which childlessness for the sake of lifestyle and comfort is often seen as normal. Although I do not think there is a duty to have children, a marriage that is deliberately not open to children for the sake of self is a sub-Christian marriage. Note I do not say “an act of sexual intimacy that is not open”, nor do I mention “a lack of openness through in/sub-fertility”.

    Like

  2. Thank you for posting this. It is a relief amidst the pressure on Christians that they are some how less favorable if they do obtain the standards of Genesis to get married and have children.
    It is interesting to think there is no longer an obligation to have children. I don’t even think I would be as presumptious to say that there is an obligation to be open. Take a missionary couple who would see having children as a hindrance to the work they believe God has called them to do. Although we must always be open to God’s will for our lives, that couple might pray that if God wanted them to have children he Himself would place that desire in their heart.

    Like

  3. Fair enough. But what I would say that this does not comfort the person who has a biological desire to procreate, regardless of theological belief. I don’t think theology in this case can alleviate someone of the desire to be a parent. It merely comforts the person who feels misplaced guilt in the eyes of God for not having procreated.

    Like

Comments welcome here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.