Since being joined to the church, I have always struggled with the notion of children being ‘sent out’ of the service. I hear the rhetoric of church as ‘family’ and so often see this translated as ‘the men’ going off to do their thing, ‘the women’ going off to do their thing, and ‘the children’ going off to do their thing. Lots of groups ‘doing their thing’; but not much family. It’s all a bit like a ‘get your own lunch today’ day that we sometimes have at our place … and, as convenient as it sometimes is, and as it means that I usually get to eat what I want to eat (when I want to eat it), I don’t like it one bit!
Having a toddler of my own has not changed my mind about kids in church one bit. Sure, it’s not always the most convenient way to pray while someone is pulling off your glasses and hitting you in the head with a Bible, but I want to publically worship with my daughter and with the other kids, not have them shoved out to the back hall while ‘we’ do the real ‘church stuff’. Not only are these young people missing out on worshipping with – and learning from – us adults, but we are missing out on worshipping with – and learning from – our kids.
Of course, we’re all familiar with the old arguments that kids learn differently, that their attention spans are less – and these are important considerations that I don’t want to undermine – but what I (and too often they) really hear is ‘they’re a distraction’, and ‘we can’t be bothered thinking of a way of doing church that is relevant to non-adults, or at least to non-adults different from ‘us’.
So it is that I was excited to come across the following words from FW Boreham, cited by Geoff Pound (and reprinted here with his permission):
I am told that, away beyond the Never-Never ranges [remote areas of Australian outback] there is a church from which the children are excluded before the sermon begins.
I wish my informant had not told me of its existence. I am not often troubled with nightmare, my supper being quite a frugal affair.
But just occasionally I find myself a victim of the terror by night. And when I am mercifully awakened, and asked why I am gasping so horribly and perspiring so freely. I have to confess that I was dreaming that I had somehow become the minister of that childless congregation.
As is usual after nightmare, I look round with a sense of inexpressible thankfulness on discovering that it was only a horrid dream. An appointment to such a charge would be to me a most fearsome and terrifying prospect. I could not trust myself.
In a way, I envy the man who can hold his own under such circumstances. His transcendent powers enable him to preserve his sturdy humanness of character, his charming simplicity of diction, his graphic picturesqueness of phrase, and his exquisite winsomeness of behaviour without the extraneous assistance which the children render to some of us.
But I could not do it. I should go all to pieces. And so, when I dream that I have entered a pulpit from which I can survey no roguish young faces and mischievous wide-open eyes, I fancy I am ruined and undone. I watch with consternation as the little people file out during the hymn before the sermon, and I know that the sermon is doomed. The children in the congregation are my salvation. – FW Boreham, ‘Pity My Simplicity!’ Mushrooms on the Moor (London: Charles H Kelly, 1915), 151-152.
If the NT is anything of a reliable witness, it is clear that kids loved being with Jesus. What does this tell us about Jesus? What ought this tell us about the way that the church (the body of which he is head) ought to be?
On Good Friday this year, I took my daughter to a service at the Baptist Church in St Andrews. Many things struck me at that service. Here’s three of them: (i) The worship leader made an enormous effort to help ‘all’ those at the service to worship God in a way that was meaningful to them; (ii) The welcome of children was a fantastic and practical reflection of the stained-glassed window above the communion table that represented Jesus welcoming children; and (iii) Sitting on a pew surrounded by the wriggles and voices of children and their praise, I worshipped God with them.
Three further notes:
1. I am not necessarily advocating the cessation of Sunday Schools.
2. Perhaps the argument that children are better served by the Christian family via some more age-appropriate teaching time (during the sermon, for example) is the most practical (and convenient) compromise, but is it really the best option? I don’t know. Perhaps it is. If so, how can churches better communicate to young people that this service to them is an act of love and an affirmation of their value to the community, and to God? Perhaps this is the real issue behind this post.
3. My wife is convinced that my theological idealisms do not translate into the ‘real world’. She may be right! She usually is!
I share your frustrated view of the church – all those groups!.
This is where ‘open church’ has its benefits – where everyone is invited to particpate and join in. Families truly worshipping together.
We home educate our children and are used to doing things together = adults and children together.
Blessings as you find a way to worship with your children, in your home at least.
jo, nz
LikeLike
I was raised in a store front church in Philadelphia. We kids had Sunday school then we had to sit with our mothers in service. If we “acted up” my mother would have to correct us. If we were tired we’d fall asleep.
The beauty of this is that I heard the gospel not through my Sunday school teacher but through the preacher which happened to be my late grandfather. I came to the knowledge of the Savior through the preaching of the world.
Now in these times (I’m 22), many churches do the children’s church thing. I guess the adults have short tension spans. But I think that’s a shame that many churches separate the kids from the main service.
LikeLike
It doesn’t have to be an all-or-nothing affair.
In our parish the service begins with the children in, they are blessed as they leave for ‘children’s church’ where they have an age-appropriate lesson, and then they return to celebrate Holy Communion with the rest of the church.
LikeLike
The irony is, speaking from a preacher’s point of view, I don’t want the children to leave–even during the sermon. This always means that some adults have to leave to tend to them, and some are already gone to mind the nursery. My thought is that if a child is ‘old enough’ for baptism, they should be ‘old enough’ to worship with the church. This is how they learn. It might help if parents would teach their children to mind, but I think sometimes parents want the church to be the babysitter during the worship so the parent can have a break. (I find worship exhausting, so there is no break :) )
I remember one time while serving a small congregation in West Virginia preaching the Sunday Sermon with my son on my hip. My wife was out of town, my son was twoish, and congregation didn’t lift a finger to help. So, I preached the sermon with a little less animation and held my son with one arm. And I didn’t cut anything out either–I made them endure the entire sermon (or the entire son).
It’s a tough call. I see both sides, and practically speaking, if you don’t offer such services to people nowadays, it is likely they won’t be back; however, I’d prefer all children to be with their parents and the other adults at all times.
jerry
LikeLike
Jesus don’t have children,
why symbolic at church often show jesus with nice children.
jesus born in middle east, why christmas moment always with snow..??
middle east have snow… I don’t think so.
think about it
LikeLike
Lebanon at least has snow each year at Christmas time.
LikeLike