‘With growing successes in popular culture, Evangelicalism increasingly risks becoming assimilated by it. Obsessed with its own relevance, the movement has shown that it is as capable of surrendering its soul to the mall just as mainline Protestantism has largely offered itself to the academy. Often mixed with a genuine concern for reaching non-Christians, winning respect has become a major motive. Sociologist Christian Smith has recently described American spirituality as “moralistic, therapeutic deism,” and he says that this fits those raised in Evangelical churches as well as any others. If Fundamentalism reduced sin to sin s (or at least things they considered vices), contemporary Evangelicals seem to have reduced sin to dysfunction. In this context, Jesus is not the savior from the curse of the law, but a life coach who leads us to a better self, better marriages, and happier kids’. – Michael Horton in Russell D. Moore, Denny Burk, John R. Franke, Darryl Hart, Michael Horton, and David Lyle Jeffrey, ‘Evangelicalism Today: A Symposium: Six Evangelicals Assess Their Movement’, Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity 20/9 (November 2007).
Jason,
isn’t it Euthyphro, in Plato’s diatribe, who makes the point: that he who defines the question[s], win the argument.
This seems to be where American Evangelicals are it, in general. We are allowing the culture to define and ask the questions . . . in turn causing us to seek answers that God never intended to answer–at least in the way the culture at large frames their questions.
Anyway, good point and post. I’m glad I found your blog again.
In Christ,
Bobby
LikeLike